<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video of a Bike Theft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citybikerblog.com/2007/12/video-of-a-bike-theft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citybikerblog.com/2007/12/video-of-a-bike-theft/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:00:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: citybiker</title>
		<link>http://www.citybikerblog.com/2007/12/video-of-a-bike-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>citybiker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citybiker.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/video-of-a-bike-theft/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sam,

I don&#039;t want to discourage people from getting Lo-Jack...  the more Lo-Jack&#039;s are out there, the better it is for everyone.  Police usually find more than one bike when they recover one with Lo-Jack...

But even if they welded it to the frame (which would make it easier to find) someone who is familiar with the bike could probably find it in a couple of minutes...then unwire it or put a power drill to it...  Or if they&#039;re techy, they can get a &quot;bug scanner&quot; from a spy store to check if there&#039;s a broadcast signal coming from the bike and jam it until they find the unit.

Having said that, I think Lo-Jack is a great layer of security...  as is a silent alarm with a remote, or a chain, or a disc lock... and def. worth it for a new high risk bike.  Even if it is disarmed 30 minutes after the theft, that might be enough time for the police to catch up with them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sam,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to discourage people from getting Lo-Jack&#8230;  the more Lo-Jack&#8217;s are out there, the better it is for everyone.  Police usually find more than one bike when they recover one with Lo-Jack&#8230;</p>
<p>But even if they welded it to the frame (which would make it easier to find) someone who is familiar with the bike could probably find it in a couple of minutes&#8230;then unwire it or put a power drill to it&#8230;  Or if they&#8217;re techy, they can get a &#8220;bug scanner&#8221; from a spy store to check if there&#8217;s a broadcast signal coming from the bike and jam it until they find the unit.</p>
<p>Having said that, I think Lo-Jack is a great layer of security&#8230;  as is a silent alarm with a remote, or a chain, or a disc lock&#8230; and def. worth it for a new high risk bike.  Even if it is disarmed 30 minutes after the theft, that might be enough time for the police to catch up with them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.citybikerblog.com/2007/12/video-of-a-bike-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citybiker.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/video-of-a-bike-theft/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>I thought they were welded to the frame and unremovable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought they were welded to the frame and unremovable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citybiker</title>
		<link>http://www.citybikerblog.com/2007/12/video-of-a-bike-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>citybiker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citybiker.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/video-of-a-bike-theft/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Yeah for $600 it&#039;s worth it.

The only down side is - on a sport bike, the crooks will probably find a lo-jack pretty quickly (once they have it someplace they can take a closer look) - there aren&#039;t many places to hide something like that on most bikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah for $600 it&#8217;s worth it.</p>
<p>The only down side is &#8211; on a sport bike, the crooks will probably find a lo-jack pretty quickly (once they have it someplace they can take a closer look) &#8211; there aren&#8217;t many places to hide something like that on most bikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.citybikerblog.com/2007/12/video-of-a-bike-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citybiker.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/video-of-a-bike-theft/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Also to note, if I were buying a late model bike in the 10K area, then buying a lo jack for $600 bucks doesn&#039;t seem like a bad idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also to note, if I were buying a late model bike in the 10K area, then buying a lo jack for $600 bucks doesn&#8217;t seem like a bad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

